Underreported
Royalties as a Percent of Reported Royalties
In our examinations, we found that in a high percentage of cases, licensees owed the licensor more than two times the amount paid in royalties. As a percentage of reported royalties, we found that of all licensees:
In our examinations, we found that in a high percentage of cases, licensees owed the licensor more than two times the amount paid in royalties. As a percentage of reported royalties, we found that of all licensees:
·
25%
underreport the royalties they owe by more than 100% of the total amount
reported
·
7%
underreport the royalties they owe by 50 to 99% of the total amount reported
·
8%
underreport the royalties they owe by 25 to 49%
·
11%
underreport the royalties they owe by 11 - 24%
·
11%
underreport the royalties they owe by 6 to 10%
·
27%
underreport royalties they owe by 1 to 5%
·
11%
accurately report royalties owed
Invotex also
helpfully reports the reasons for underreporting. Notably, the report states that, “56% underreport sales; [and] questionable
license interpretation accounts for 44% of the total misreported dollar amount.” Apparently, Invotex has, perhaps unsurprisingly,
found that licensees will interpret certain terms such as “the definition of
the product to how to calculate the sale” in ways that result in lower royalty
amounts. This interpretation issue can
be the result of poor drafting and Invotex notes that, “outright fraud is a
rare occurrence.” The report states other sources of underreported
royalty amounts including: Royalties from Disallowed Deductions; Math Errors;
Royalty Rate Errors; Unreported Sublicenses; Transfer Prices; and Unreported
Benchmarks and Milestones. Invotex also
reports that it audited a major pharmaceutical company on behalf of a research
university and found that, “Based on our audit, an underpayment of more than
75% of what had originally been reported to the client was uncovered and paid
to our client. This underpayment was based on the overestimation of discounts,
the use of transfer prices instead of third party pricing and the
misclassification of sublicensee revenue.”
In a recent article
in Corporate Counsel, Invotex’s Deborah R. Stewart and Judy A. Byrd offer
advice for how to maximize the opportunity to receive 100% of the royalties you
are entitled. Ms. Stewart and Ms.
Byrd provide a sage “Takeaway”:
The role of
in-house counsel is changing. Many corporate counsel are now evaluated not only
on effectiveness and efficiency, but increasingly, on how they contribute to
the company’s financial bottom line. Capturing the full value of your corporate
royalties will increase your firm’s revenue. The solution may be easier than
you realize.
Best practice dictates a systematic license compliance program that includes royalty audits. Audits typically generate positive results for the licensor and can turn your “cost center” into a revenue-generating resource.
IP licensing is
one of the most significant and fastest-growing sources of an organization’s
earnings, yet it remains one of the most poorly managed and underutilized
assets. Managing a successful licensee compliance program is like managing
everything else. It takes time and interest to keep it on track.
Are the experiences of readers of this blog similar in discovering
underreporting of royalties?
3 comments:
But is this reporting on a representative sample of licences?
Presumably Invotex is not saying that there is underreporting in 89% of all licences. Just in 89% of the cases where they have been called in.
However, a licensor would only call them in if it already had reasonable grounds to suspect that there was underreporting.
Mr. Jackson,
Thank you, those are both excellent points. There is certainly some selection bias. My guess is that Invotex's main point is that if you need an auditor, they are the best firm for the job. I do think they are also trying to make the secondary point that there probably is underreporting in many licenses because of the nature of the causes of underreporting that they have found. Best, Mike
I think even in successful organised companies many a licence gets forgotten by licensors and licensees. Someone I knew recently recruited to a well known company identified lots of licences they never knew they had, and no longer needed. It's hard enough sometimes to get a company to keep a list of it patent cases. Often they don't have a centralised list. I would imagine licence obligations are even more chaotically documented in many organisations.
Post a Comment