Google and Intertrust have announced the creation of Patent
Shield, which is designed to protect startups. Essentially, the exchange is
access to a patent portfolio for an equity stake in the startup. It seems to put startups in the position of a
much more resourced company with a portfolio of patents and presumably freedom
to operate. This appears to be another
attempt to get ahead of something like the patent troll problem; however, it seems
to be aimed at patent demands from entities that are practicing not absolute non-practicing
entities because the portfolio is supposed to provide leverage against the
entity asserting infringement initially.
Interestingly, this appears to be a great way for Google and Intertrust
to find licensing partners for their patented technology without looking like a
“bad guy” by operating through patent demand letters—let them come to us. Very clever.
It also gives Intertrust the opportunity to offer its IP services to startups, and maybe a chance for additional investment/acquisition opportunities through notice about great new startups that have attracted the attention of established players in the market. Very, very clever. For more details, please see here.
"Where money issues meet IP rights". This weblog looks at financial issues for intellectual property rights: securitisation and collateral, IP valuation for acquisition and balance sheet purposes, tax and R&D breaks, film and product finance, calculating quantum of damages--anything that happens where IP meets money.
Showing posts with label intertrust. Show all posts
Showing posts with label intertrust. Show all posts
Friday, 28 April 2017
"Opportunistic" Google and Intertrust Launch "Patent Shield": Protection for Startups
Labels:
Google,
intertrust,
non practicing entities,
NPEs,
PAEs,
patent assertion entities,
patent shield,
patent trolls
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)