·
Acquired CyberFone Systems and its patent
portfolio which has generated 32 settlement and license agreements for a total
of $15.5 million in revenue
·
Acquired US Patent 5,331,637 from MOSAID
Technologies, one of the world's leading intellectual property management
companies
·
Entered into a strategic relationship with IP
Navigation (IPNav), the leader in full-service patent monetization
·
Completed the acquisition of Sampo IP LLC
acquiring its patent portfolio consisting of three patents and one pending
patent application
·
Commenced our first licensing campaign on March
20, 2013 by filing a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of Texas against Sony Computer Entertainment
America LLC, Siemens Energy, Inc., CB Apex Realtors, d/b/a Coldwell Banker Apex
Realtors, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Juniper Networks, Inc., Winn
Dixie Stores, Inc., and Dell, Inc.
·
Established a new IP Research and Services
Center at the University of Arizona Science & Technology Park in Tucson,
Arizona . . . .
Since April 25, 2013,
MPG has also, through its subsidiaries, filed patent infringement lawsuits
against Ambit Energy Holdings LLC, BMC
Software Inc., HomeAway Inc., Hoover's Inc. and Ristken Software in the Eastern
District of Texas; Thompson Reuters in the District of Delaware; Sprint Nextel
Corporation, Juniper Networks, Cisco Systems, Bloomberg L.P., Hitachi Cable
America, D-Link Corporation, Avaya, Hewlett-Packard Company, Enterasys
Networks, Extreme Networks, TIBCO Software, BT Group, SAVVIS Inc., Zhone
Technologies, Huawei Technologies, Allied Telesis, and Adtran in the District
of Delaware; and E*Trade Financial
Corporate Services Inc., Liberty Mutual Group Inc., Aetna Inc., Avon Products
Inc., Starbucks Corporation, Yum! Brands Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, and
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. in the Eastern District of Texas. Like I mentioned before, MPG is getting a lot
of press for its activity.
Co-blogger Neil Wilkof recently raised the question about the interest of boards in questions concerning IP—and he
expressly excluded an entity such as MPG.
An entity such as MPG, of course, is primarily concerned with IP and
notably, patent expert Professor Craig Nard recently joined MPG's board of directors. I think that the importance
of IP will lead companies to move toward accessing the services of companies
like MPG although presently MPG seems mostly (?) involved in the enforcement of
its IP. I also think more companies will
seek to draw in more IP experts on their boards—including some professors. Does anyone have a sense of whether companies
are utilizing the valuation, auditing or related services of companies similar
to MPG (although MPG may be a different breed according to Forbes)? The Forbes article indicates
that some companies may be doing just that with MPG.
No comments:
Post a Comment