The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is working with the United States Patent and Trademark Office to essentially determine if the benefits of small claims patent courts outweigh the costs. The ACUS website states:
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is engaging ACUS
to conduct an independent study of issues associated with and options for
designing a small claims patent court. The resulting report, which will
ultimately be submitted to Congress, will address, among other topics, whether
there is need for a small claims patent court, the feasibility and potential
structure of such a court, and the relevant legal, policy, and practical
considerations in establishing a small claims court.
The ACUS is accepting comments, here.
The Request for Proposals document for consultants to work with the
ACUS states:
Since at least the late 1980s, concerns have been raised that
the high cost of patent litigation deters small- and medium-sized enterprises,
particularly those owned by traditionally underrepresented groups, from seeking
patent protection enforcement. Policymakers, scholars, and organizations have
studied whether a small-claims procedure is needed for resolving patent
disputes. They have reached different conclusions and proposed different
actions. . . .
[The report may discuss:] Whether there is need for a small
claims patent court; • The operation and structure of similar small claims
intellectual property tribunals in the United States and elsewhere; • The
relevant laws that would govern the establishment of a small claims patent
court, including the United States Constitution and applicable statutes and
regulations; • The policy and practical considerations in establishing a small
claims patent court; • The institutional placement, structure, and internal
organization of a potential small claims patent court, including whether it
should be established within the federal courts, as or within an Article I
court, or as an administrative tribunal.
March 4, 2022, is the deadline for
proposals.
No comments:
Post a Comment