Monday, 28 September 2009

Is IP Being Overloved?

›
I am a two minds about how to position IP in the larger business context. Does the fact that I engage in IP for mylivelihood skew my view o...
3 comments:
Thursday, 24 September 2009

On Teaching "IP as a Cost"; "IP as a Profit Centre"

›
I had an interesting phone conversation this week with US colleagues who are planning to deliver a course on IP at their local business scho...
4 comments:
Tuesday, 22 September 2009

Aggregate IP Data is Nice, But What About All Those Other Countries?

›
I guess I am a micro-man at heart, and I have never quite understood what one is to make of macro data on IP filings and registrations. Eve...
Monday, 21 September 2009

Woolworths’ Woolly IP Agreements Don’t Hold Value

›
Case Digest : Butters and others v BBC Worldwide Ltd and others [2009] EWHC 1954 (Ch), 20 August 2009 A dispute between the Woolworths admi...

Growth in IP rights before economic crisis

›
A new WIPO report monitoring recent trends in demand for IP rights relating to patents, utility models, trademarks and industrial designs s...
Friday, 18 September 2009

IP and Innovation, in the Service of SME's

›
I was following the various tweets and blogs from the prodigious Duncan Bucknell of the iconic IPThinkTank blog in connection with the recen...
1 comment:
Wednesday, 16 September 2009

UNCITRAL and security rights in IP

›
Last month this weblog gave advance notice of a seminar it proposed to hold in Central London on the afternoon of 14 October on UNCITRAL and...
Monday, 14 September 2009

IP Ownership: Are We Up To The Task?

›
I don't know if this is a "tipping point" in the precise sense intended by Malcolm Gladwell in his 2000 bestseller-- The Tipp...
3 comments:

Canada gets US-flavoured update for IP licence/bankruptcy

›
I've just received an email circular from Paul Jones ( Jones & Co , Toronto) which contains a succinct summary of the amendments of ...